That is more a rant than anything else, and a bit faraway from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for ladies. Sure I might love to start a clothing company of my very own which would even have it’s personal “social mission” so to speak. Clothing firms targets are making money by concentrating on ladies. In the process nearly all of clothes companies make the world worse for women. It is as whether it is an agenda towards girls. In all probability most women’s kinds are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing collectively of the apparel merchandise. The few women who're in the women’s clothing design industry apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a development towards better clothes designs for ladies who want practicality, dignity and perform of their clothes. And that's the place the dilemma comes in for numerous women who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Ladies who simply need useful, snug clothes are really underrepresented . Certain, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since a whole lot of low-rise or pores and skin-tight denims, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-size shorts, and tastelessly-short skirts are the type of clothes that probably nearly all of girls buy (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothing) , then it means these are the styles that can proceed to be manufactured and furthermore these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their way into all sorts of women’s clothes, even the ones which are supposed to be for operate not fashion. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so on. It's not the one clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates fashion into perform. It brings us again to where we started. As quite a few girls who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothing for higher fit, better consolation, higher freedom of motion and higher durability. I would say that normally unisex sizing is one of the best strategy to go with some features that would help accommodate people who may need a bit extra hip or belly (each men and women). Nearly all of women’s “active wear” just don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are bigger even in the case of “small” sizes for males. I doubt this is inconceivable. Typically, girls can match into men’s clothing this fashion. The scrubs have been supplied by the facility. I just lately was working in a research facility and was required to put on scrubs. I informed her that in the case of scrubs, a dimension small pant doesn't fit me and it is strange as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants fit me. The provision individual said she thought a dimension small would match me. The provision person said that it's because women have hips and males don’t. I told her that it appears that evidently plenty of small-sized men would find it exhausting to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What lots of people seem to forget is that some males do have pretty-prominent hips and the vast majority of men’s clothes are meant for males with perfectly straight hips. In actual fact when males get older, in their 40s they very often develop bigger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio commercial for a particular sort of Levis denims which were meant for older men and it was stated that the options had more room within the hip and thigh. But males have a better deal relating to clothes. Women’s clothing is at all times made to incorporate trend moderately than perform. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Put up, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Information, and numerous other such shops, or on-line shops have a few of the better types of clothing meant for hiking and other outside actions. Manufacturers reminiscent of Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and various others. These manufacturers tend to have the very best materials, and the perfect options. They have the most effective mix of fabrics so as to be lightweight as attainable for scorching days and which may protect in cold days with out plenty of bulk. They tend to have SPF built in to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to use a big dimension to have room for my shoulders and arms but then the part of the jacket that was below the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to put on and simply had a really awkward look to it. But, I have seen such absurdly-cut jackets for women by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to enhance the female form whereas being “useful” for outside exercise, or that is what the designers had in mind and but I have to surprise what they were thinking by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and proscribing once i moved. I don’t know how it ever got manufactured and possibly 1000's were made and it appeared to be a waste of time and supplies and it seemed as if the “quality management people” missed some main design flaws. I wish I wrote down the model number in order that maybe I might find a link to it in the internet and maybe you all can see for your self. There are different women’s active wear that might not be as excessive however which still have enough lack of perform so that the majority active women just can't use them. The Hole and Previous Navy will not be notably for energetic wear but they have small line of such clothes. I think that they're terrible in material and design. The Gap, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Target, Okay-Mart and different such stores, primarily only have clothes made from cotton ( with just a few exceptions). Modell’s is imagined to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries train clothing for girls which is made by Nike, Addidas (etc) and though these are nicely-known brand names, I discover that they actually put too much style into clothes on the expense of function. They went out of business years in the past however they also had clothes for ladies that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis the place I reside there's one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-effectively-identified store in lower Manhattan which sells all kinds of outside/camping/hiking gear and clothes. There was a retailer in NYC known as Herman’s and one other called Robbin’s. Removed from it. I've seen girls in these stores talking to sales associates and saying that they've looked in all places for more practical designs . There may be an organization that numerous you most likely have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively wear. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and some Old Navy’s and It would appear that there are quite a lot of shops that will have something for each lady. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their styles are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas taking part in sports activities or partaking in rugged outside activities. Why do I at all times discover that the clothes that come the closest to being practical and rugged and sensible are those which can be discontinued and replaced by those who aren’t? Their women’s bathing fits are really useless. They're meant for ladies who've good figures , even who're skilled fashions and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They could proceed a certain type for several seasons or they could change the type and by no means revive it. Why ought to any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had sure sorts of designs called “Grab and Go” that means that the clothes are so virtually designed which you could simply grab them, throw them on, and walk out the door to train or do anything. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as marketed to be. Throughout my life I've gone from retailer to retailer during sure times of the yr on the lookout for the best rugged and purposeful clothes for winter or summer season. It's always arduous to search out anything close to what I need. It often goes for shoes and slippers and other footwear too. I typically have to take whatever comes closest and that's often within the men’s part. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they had been made the best way they were.. I once discovered some comfy slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd thing was that the soles had been designed with pretty-deep grooves that have been very closely spaced and they were all over the only real . Simply why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They are the principle piece of clothes that can be touching the bottom and going by all sorts of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing shoes which are meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to scrub. I can’t for the life of me understand why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and but it does not work on any form of foot put on like it really works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothing producer seen this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (etc) get caught within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires means that quite a lot of the debris might be hurled off. No human can create that kind of bodily pressure to continually power the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way in which that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles exhausting to wash. It means that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots can be filled up with debris and would not help much in helping the wearer to effectively climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are literally meant to enable the wearer to climb. It appears to me that if the soles are made of rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that only accumulate dirt. I ponder why there aren’t chemists and clothing technicians engaged on a better type of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking footwear are used, and it would make it pointless to make grooves on the soles of footwear. I've observed some unusual designs that don't contribute to operate. It seems to me that grooves are just placed on the soles of shoes for trend purposes. This goes for sneakers too. A lot of sneakers which would be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. So far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and other such sorts of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are these with drawstrings. After all I'm not an professional in making footwear or shoe-soles and that i could be unsuitable , but I am enough of an knowledgeable in sporting sneakers meant for energetic lifestyles and I feel that a number of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the improper factor. I'm wondering why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the back of the pants waist space. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I believe it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in shops comparable to K-Mart and Target where there are a large variety of women’s underwear. It is tough to find the sort of briefs that most of our grandmothers used to put on, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible for my part. I want comfort, sturdiness and easy-care. All that doesn't speak for me. Anything that gets caught you-know-the place is unacceptable. I've been in the underwear part of shops and different stores (I must admit I by no means seemed in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t anticipate to search out something practical there), and I've seen older girls trying to find one thing that's age-appropriate and dignified and , again, sensible. There's little apart from those hello-cuts. See one of the links under for an article in regards to the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” are usually not modest sufficient. It seems it has all the time been about physically limiting girls. That’s the best way I take a look at it. Additionally one of many hyperlinks beneath lead to an article about how there will probably be a women’s like of clothing which can be inspired by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It implies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have discovered to what I choose is a sure Jockey model temporary “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher kind of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone more simply . I have to order a measurement bigger than I normally would so that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One main flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the actual goal of “athletic bras” the way in which they are designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I really don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for energetic lifestyles ought to hold them in, nothing more. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some female runners who seem like high heavy and still they are very fast but I'm wondering if they'll develop back problems later in life. I do know that I might not be addressing the wants of ladies born with sure sizes, or who've particular wants reminiscent of after surgical procedure, but sport bras should be made to have sufficient comfortable tension to prevent bouncing. leggings and bra set There's a need for bras that do what some jock straps are supposed to do. I want to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the precise area that might make bras pointless. It would be wonderful for hotter weather and for simplicity, so you don’t must hassle with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Simply keep “them” from shifting. Just slip into your shirt (and other clothes ) and you may go out to stroll , jog or no matter. Why isn’t there such a factor? I feel I discussed in one in every of my earlier posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for girls called Sun Pant. I am positive plenty of girls would want such kinds of clothes. I then installed an elastic band to supply extra tension because the waist band could be a bit too massive in any other case, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which concerned chopping into the again of the waistband area for the reason that drawstring was sewn into that space. It is extremely sensible for lots of actions. It's not so lengthy that the hem drags on the floor. It is not for very very popular weather however that can rely on your own capability to tolerate sizzling weather. It is of a cloth mix that isn't like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, however generally the way in which the pockets are designed make them ineffective anyway. I discover it is a very particular person factor. That is how most hiking pants ought to be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for very hot weather very much like the original Coolibar Sun Pant. It is meant for use with a belt however I find that I don’t need one to put on this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that's for males, but which matches effectively and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of many final two hyperlinks under). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight when you bend or transfer. In fact not everybody has the identical determine as I accomplish that others may need a special opinion. But on the whole this is an effective kind of pant . Should you do prefer it it's best to write to the company and inform them to cling on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so because the openings are slits virtually fully parallel with the waist. I feel they are going to discontinue it so that you may want to present it a attempt. The fabric stretches so it's not as bad as if it have been with denims with these kinds of pockets. It's an impractical design and i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets you need to maneuver your arms in a extra unnatural way and even raise the hem of your shirt to put your arms in your entrance pants pockets. It needs to be for model, nothing else. Pockets needs to be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket caught on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I imply. However sometimes zippers could cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you set your fingers in. There is a have to design zippers of non-scraping materials for this goal. There can be another men’s pant from Columbia. I think I mentioned them earlier than (see certainly one of the 2 hyperlinks under). Why aren’t any clothes designers engaged on this? They're of an excellent materials for hot days, however for me, I found myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband area in order to make the belt unnecessary. I journey a bike. I rarely use shorts even once i jog. However again, I need to settle for whatever comes near what I want. I got here across a running brief known as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to simply go to clothing shops to take a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I just wondered why regular lengthy pants will not be made of such a cloth. It would be wonderful for a hiking pant meant for extremely popular weather. The material was very very similar to a really very lightweight softshell. There may be one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I love softshell clothes. It is extremely lightweight, not very good for cold weather by itself however you can put layering underneath it. It is flexible and matches excellently and permits freedom of movement. However softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer. Also , why aren’t there any really actually practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an excellent summertime softshell. There must be a vest for traveling. I discover myself wishing for such a factor. It doesn't exist. Why not make one among lightweight and stretchy material? I know that I've mentioned to a lot in this put up. I will cease for now. I hope I didn't bore anybody. I have loads of concepts for the higher design of clothes and I will probably post again with my ideas until I'm informed to not. I might have been a bit political too.
